Monroe Daly

Chair of English, IDEA University

Faculty Perceptions of Chair

Results from this survey will be used to provide constructive feedback regarding the department chair’s efficacy in carrying out administrative responsibilities. As you reflect on the chair's overall performance, please provide a fair and honest review of strengths as well as areas for improvement.

To encourage honesty and objectivity, you are asked not to identify yourself. Results of the survey will be summarized into one aggregate report. Individual respondent survey results will not be shared. Do realize, however, that your responses to open-ended questions will be provided verbatim to the department chair. Thus, you should avoid comments that could reveal your identity. Do realize, however, that your responses to open-ended questions will be provided verbatim to the chair. Please avoid any comments that might reveal your identity. Adhere to a high level of professionalism and refrain from using inappropriate or threatening comments that could result in legal action that would compel IDEA to break confidentiality.

Please take a moment to read IDEA’s Statement of Confidentiality.

Completing this survey takes approximately 20 minutes, so please allow sufficient time to provide thoughtful, fair and honest responses.

Part I. Responsibilities

The list below describes responsibilities which many department chairs pursue. Rate the performance of your department chair over the past year on each of these responsibilities by selecting the number which best represents your judgment. If you feel you have an insufficient basis for making a rating on a given responsibility, mark in the X column to indicate omit response. Please assign a value of Poor, Fair, In Between, Good, or Outstanding, for each of the following responsibilities..

Response Options

  • 1 = Poor
  • 2 = Fair
  • 3 = In Between
  • 4 = Good
  • 5 = Outstanding
  • X = Omit Response

You've responded to 0 of 21 questions in this group

Part II. Personal Characteristics

To what degree do Items 22-32 below represent a "strength" or a "weakness" of your chair? Select the number which best corresponds to your judgment. Omit if you feel unable to make a valid judgment.

Response Options

  • 1 = Definite Weakness
  • 2 = More a Weakness Than a Strength
  • 3 = In Between
  • 4 = More a Strength Than a Weakness
  • 5 = Definite Strength
  • X = Omit Response

You've responded to 0 of 11 questions in this group

Part III. Administrative Methods

To what degree do the following statements represent a "strength" or a "weakness" of your department chair? Select the number which best corresponds to your judgment. Omit items where you feel unable to make a valid judgment.

Response Options

  • 1 = Definite Weakness
  • 2 = More a Weakness Than a Strength
  • 3 = In Between
  • 4 = More a Strength Than a Weakness
  • 5 = Definite Strength
  • X = Omit Response

You've responded to 0 of 21 questions in this group

Part IV. Summary Judgment

Use this code to answer following two items:

Response Options

  • 1 = Strongly Disagree
  • 2 = Disagree
  • 3 = In Between
  • 4 = Agree
  • 5 = Strongly Agree
  • X = Omit Response

You've responded to 0 of 2 questions in this group

Part V. Open-ended Comments

Please respond by writing in your response to the following questions.

You've responded to 0 of 4 questions in this group

Group 1

This is a Likert question group description for Likert question group 1

Response Options

  • 1 = Very Low
  • 2 = Low
  • 3 = In Between
  • 4 = High
  • 5 = Very High

You've responded to 0 of 1 questions in this group

Group 2

This is a Open question group description for Open question group 2

You've responded to 0 of 1 questions in this group